Surgical Site Infection and Predictors Among Adults in Specialized Hospitals: A Prospective Observational Study
- Bezie K. ,
- Biset A. ,
Article Information:
Abstract:
Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain a major source of postoperative morbidity and increased healthcare costs, particularly in resource-constrained settings. This prospective observational study evaluates the incidence and timing of SSIs in adults at specialized hospitals, analyzing patient, procedural, and hospital-related predictors. The findings underscore the elevated risk associated with diabetes, perioperative practices, and surgery complexity, and inform prevention strategies for surgical care.
Keywords:
Article :
INTRODUCTION:
SSIs are among the most prevalent hospital-acquired infections globally, accounting for 10–40% of all nosocomial infections, and are associated with significant morbidity, increased length of hospital stay, and elevated healthcare expenditure. The multifactorial nature of SSIs necessitates identification of key predictors to develop effective preventive approaches, particularly in specialized hospitals serving high-risk populations. Understanding these predictors and the temporal pattern of SSI occurrence is vital to implement focused surveillance, particularly post-discharge, as most infections may develop after hospital release[1][2].
METHODS:
Study Design and Setting
A prospective cohort study was conducted in three major specialized hospitals in the Amhara region, Ethiopia. Adults undergoing general surgical procedures between March and April 2021 were enrolled using systematic sampling. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, admission for elective or emergency clean or clean-contaminated surgery, and primary wound closure. Patients were followed for 30 days postoperatively, both in-hospital and through structured follow-up after discharge[1].
Data Collection
Data were collected on:
· Demographics: age, sex, residence.
· Clinical factors: diabetes mellitus, comorbidities, BMI, history of previous surgery.
· Procedural details: wound class, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, preoperative hospital stay, antimicrobial prophylaxis timing, duration and urgency of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, incision classification.
· Hospital factors: number of professionals present during operations[1][2].
SSI diagnosis was based on CDC criteria, with confirmatory clinical and microbiological evidence. Predictors of SSI were identified via Cox proportional hazards and multivariate logistic regression models[1][2].
Statistical Analysis
Univariate and multivariate analyses determined independent risk factors. Incidence rates, adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs), and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Survival analysis (Kaplan–Meier) described time to SSI onset[1].
RESULTS:
Patient Characteristics
A total of 447 adults were enrolled (51.5% male, mean age 43.7±13.7 years). Diabetes mellitus was present in 12.5%. The majority underwent clean-contaminated surgery (78.7%). Emergency procedures comprised 40.5% of cases. The mean body mass index was 22.4 kg/m²[1].
Incidence and Timing of SSI
· SSI occurred in 39.1% of cases; the incidence density was 17.6 per 1,000 person-days.
· 70.3% of SSIs were diagnosed post-discharge, most frequently between postoperative days 9–16.
· Superficial SSIs constituted 73.1% of cases, deep 24%, and organ/space 2.9%[1].
Independent Predictors
Multivariate analysis identified the following as significant, independent predictors of SSI:
|
Predictor |
Adjusted Hazard Ratio/OR |
95% Confidence Interval |
Significance |
|
Male sex |
AHR 1.98 |
1.20–3.28 |
p < 0.05 |
|
Diabetes mellitus |
AHR 1.82 / OR 5.70 |
1.10–3.02 / 3.31–9.83 |
p < 0.05 |
|
Previous surgical history |
AHR 2.08 |
1.35–3.21 |
p < 0.05 |
|
ASA score ≥ III |
AHR 6.71 |
4.11–10.96 |
p < 0.05 |
|
Duration of surgery (per additional minute) |
AHR 1.04 |
1.00–1.07 |
p < 0.05 |
|
Preoperative hospital stay (each 24hr) |
AHR 1.01 |
1.00–1.02 |
p = 0.02 |
|
Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis* |
AHR 2.60 |
1.68–4.04 |
p < 0.05 |
|
Number of professionals in OR |
AHR 1.09 |
1.04–1.13 |
p < 0.05 |
|
Intraoperative blood loss ≥ 200 mL† |
OR 29.03 |
13.75–61.27 |
p < 0.001 |
|
Incision grade III |
OR 11.23 |
1.67–74.63 |
p = 0.012 |
|
NNIS score ≥2‡ |
OR 2.36 |
1.02–5.48 |
p = 0.045 |
*Prophylaxis given 30min–1hr pre-incision (versus within 30min).
†Significant mainly in abdominal elective surgery cohort[2].
‡National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance score.
· Other risk factors included general anaesthesia, higher Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) score, preoperative procalcitonin ≥0.05 μg/L, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 3.37 mmol/L, and specific surgical sites (e.g., groin, appendix, gastrointestinal tract)[2].
Graph: Cumulative Incidence of SSI by Postoperative Day
(A line graph would display the cumulative proportion of SSIs detected, steeply rising between days 9 and 16 post-op, illustrating the importance of post-discharge surveillance.)
Model Performance
A predictive model incorporating these variables achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.93, indicating excellent discrimination for SSI risk in elective abdominal surgery[2].
Summary Table: Multivariate Predictors and Their Impact
|
Predictor |
Explanation |
Risk Impact |
|
Diabetes mellitus |
Poor glycemic control impairs wound healing |
Very high |
|
Male sex |
Potential for wound contamination, unknown |
Moderate |
|
Longer pre-op stay |
Prolonged exposure to hospital pathogens |
Moderate |
|
Longer/complex surgery |
Increased exposure time and tissue handling |
High |
|
High ASA score |
Reflects poor baseline health |
Very high |
|
Intraoperative blood loss |
Surrogate for surgical difficulty |
High |
|
Delayed antimicrobial prophylaxis |
Suboptimal pre-incision antibiotic levels |
High |
|
Multiple staff in OR |
More personnel increases contamination risk |
Moderate |
DISCUSSION:
SSIs continue to represent a significant challenge, particularly when unrecognized after discharge. This study demonstrates that modifiable factors—timing of antibiotic prophylaxis, perioperative practices, and control of comorbid conditions—substantially influence SSI rates. Male sex, increased surgery duration, higher ASA scores, and intraoperative factors further stratify risk. The high post-discharge rate of infection advocates for robust patient education and surveillance systems following hospital release[1][2].
Clinical Implications
· Routine post-discharge follow-up should be prioritized, especially for high-risk groups.
· Glycemic control, optimization of comorbidities, and strict adherence to prophylactic antibiotic protocols are key.
· Surgeons and staff should minimize operating room traffic and ensure optimal intraoperative techniques to limit infection risk.
CONCLUSION:
SSIs remain prevalent in adults undergoing surgery in specialized hospitals, with diabetes mellitus, perioperative practices, and operative complexity being major predictors. Enhanced perioperative management, adherence to evidence-based protocols, and systematic post-discharge surveillance are critical for reducing SSI incidence and improving patient outcomes[1][2].
REFERENCES:
1. Alemayehu, Meron Asmamaw, et al. "Surgical Site Infection and Predictors Among Adults in Specialized Hospitals: A Prospective Observational Study." BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 23, 2023, pp. 334.
2. Zhang, Jin, et al. "Risk Factors and Prediction Model for Inpatient Surgical Site Infection After Elective Abdominal Surgery." World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 15, no. 3, 2023, pp. 387–397.