Feeding Tolerance and Recovery After Neonatal Gastrointestinal Surgery

Neonatal gastrointestinal (GI) surgery is a very critical field of paediatric surgical care, often necessitated by prenatal intestinal malformations, such as intestinal atresia, malrotation, necrotizing enterocolitis, Hirschsprung’s disease and anorectal malformations. The complications that are more often encountered in the first few days of life are often associated with urgent surgical treatment to prevent morbidity and ‎[1]. Despite the improved neonatal anaesthesia, surgical practices, and intensive care, there is still a problem in the post-surgery management especially on nutritional support and feeding habits.

Growth, tissue repair, immune system as well as general healing in neonatal patients require proper nutrition  ‎[2]. However, the initiation and progression of enteral nutrition during the postoperative period in GI surgery is often delayed due to the fear of feeding intolerance and immaturity of the neonatal gut   ‎[3]. Feeding tolerance is the ability of the neonate to digest and absorb enteral nutrition without clinical signs of intolerance of vomiting, abdominal distension, increased gastric residuals or diarrhea. Such symptoms can suggest the presence of impaired gut motility or postoperative complications, which causes clinicians to retard the development of gut motility and use parenteral nutrition  ‎[4].

Even though parenteral nutrition is an interim option to the parenteral diet, its long-term use is associated with a variety of complications, including catheter-related infections, metabolic disorders and liver dysfunction. Enteral nutrition introduced early has thus become a more of an issue in the neonatal care environment. Enteral nutrition is not only supportive of gut maturation, motility, but also beneficial gut microbiota, and a decreased risk of infections  ‎[5]. However, the ideal time and development of feeding among the postoperative neonates continues to be an issue of debate.

The problem of feeding intolerance is not novel about neonatal care in the aftermath of GI surgery and is predetermined by a variety of factors, among which the gestational age, the birth weight, the nature of surgical condition, the extent of bowel involvement, the postoperative complications . Premature and low birth weight is particularly vulnerable as the gastrointestinal functioning of the infants is underdeveloped, and their physiological reserves are limited ‎[6]. Moreover, the bowel motility can be temporarily reduced by bowel manipulation of the bowel further complicating feeding tolerance .

Recent studies have suggested that early minimal enteral nutrition also known as trophic nutrition may prove useful in the stimulation of gut activity, as well as in the shortening of parenteral nutrition  ‎[7]. However, clinicians are advised to be keen on the risks and benefits since an early promotion of feeds can result in the escalation of the risks of complications, such as anastomotic leakage or necrotizing enterocolitis . In this regard, uniformity in procedures and high levels of supervision are essential to attain safety and effective feeding practices.

Neonatal GI surgery after operation is a multifactorial process that transcends the actual surgery. The feeding tolerance is a valuable parameter of gastrointestinal recovery and overall clinical improvement  ‎[8]. The early introduction of full enteral nutrition is associated with the reduction of hospital stay, leading to the better weight gain and use of less medical service. Delayed feeding tolerance on the other hand can be an increase in the length of hospitalization, risk of contracting infections, and negatively affects growth and development.

Although its clinical significance, there is no unanimity on the most appropriate practices in the feeding initiation and progression in neonates following GI surgery. The disparities between the institutional protocols and the clinical judgment normally leads to unequal practices of management ‎[9]. It highlights the need to carry out further research to give a more comprehensive view of the feeding tolerance patterns and how they are related to the postoperative recovery outcomes ‎[10]. The aim of the current research is to evaluate the feeding tolerance in neonates who underwent gastrointestinal surgery, and to determine its effect on recovery parameters. This study aims to add to evidence-based practice, which can maximize the use of postoperative care and improve the survival and quality of life of neonates by determining factors that can be associated with successful feeding and better outcome.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feeding tolerance in the neonates undergoing gastrointestinal surgery and assess its outcome relative to the postoperative recovery. This is to determine the relationship among early feeding of the infant through enteral nutrition, feeding intolerance, and clinical outcomes that include time to full feeds, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications and weight gain to optimize neonatal recovery.

Table 1: Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Neonates (n = 250)

The bar charts depict important findings of the study on the neonatal gastrointestinal surgery. The feeding tolerance chart shows that most neonates could tolerate enteral feeding, which means that it was able to manage the nutritional

A total of 250 neonates were included in the study. Early initiation of enteral nutrition was possible in most patients and significant correlations with increased feeding tolerance were found. Approximately, two-thirds of infants at full enteral nutrition during the first week after surgery. Feeding intolerance, which is observed in a lower percentage of patients, was associated with delayed the initiation of feeds and the increase in the length of stay. Neonates with good feeding tolerance showed a reduced number of postoperative complications, and better weight gain. The high level of early feeding tolerance and shortening of recovery time were significantly correlated and explained why it has a positive impact on the overall clinical outcomes and the hospital discharge rates.

status during the postoperative period. The time-to-full-feeding chart reveals that most of them were able to reach full enteral feeds within seven days indicating that gut function was early recovered. The complications chart shows that majority of the patients did not experience any postoperative complications, a factor that suggests that the patients had been given effective postoperative and clinical care. Lastly, the hospital stays chart shows that a significant percentage of the neonates were discharged within less than ten days, which proves to be more effective in recovery. All in all, these results are very important and indicate that early feeding tolerance is very important in improving recovery and minimizing complications.

Table 2: Association of Feeding Tolerance with Recovery Outcomes (n = 250)

The chart shows that there is a definite relationship between feeding tolerance and recovery outcomes. Infants with a high feeding tolerance were much more likely to recover and have fewer complications. Conversely, patients who had feeding intolerance had a higher complication rate and delayed recovery. These findings prove the applicability of the timely and effective enteral nutrition in the improvement of postoperative outcomes in neonatal gastrointestinal surgery.

Table 3: Hospital Stay Duration by Feeding Tolerance (n = 250)

The length of stay of the neonates with feeding tolerance was shorter and most of the infants were discharged during the first 10 days. In comparison, feeding intolerance was associated with a lengthy stay in the hospital. The proportion of intolerant infant neonates was above 10 days, an indication of slow recovery. Such results support the idea that feeding tolerance is an important factor that increases a quicker recovery and shortened hospitalization.

Table 4: Weight Gain by Feeding Tolerance (n = 250)

The chart indicates that weight gain in neonates who had feeding tolerance was favourable as compared to those who had feeding intolerance. Most of the tolerant neonates had an adequate weight gain with the intolerant cases more likely to have poor development. This highlights the importance of feeding tolerance in the ideal nutritional recovery and in general neonatal development following gastrointestinal surgery.

Table 5: Time to Full Enteral Feeding and Postoperative Complications (n = 250)

As demonstrated in the chart, the neonates who were able to achieve full enteral feeding in 7 days had much fewer complications as compared to those who had delayed feeding. On the other hand, babies, who spend more than 7 days in the NICU, had higher prevalence of complications. These results highlight that the early achievement of full feeding is significantly related to recovery improvement and a decrease in postoperative morbidity in neonatal gastrointestinal surgery.

.

Table 5: Time to Full Enteral Feeding and Postoperative Complications (n = 250)

The chart shows that the decreases in the number of postoperative complications relate to the early accomplishment of the full enteral nutrition (≤7 days). Babies with delayed feeding (>7 days) had a greater percentage of complications. This emphasizes that clinical significance of early feeding progression in enhancing recovery outcomes and minimizing morbidity in neonates with gastrointestinal surgery.

The present study was a trial that evaluated the feeding tolerance in relation to postoperative recovery in neonates who had undergone gastrointestinal (GI) surgery  ‎[11]. The results indicate that timely start and effective tolerance of enteral feeding is a very important factor in enhancing clinical outcomes. Most of the neonates in this study were able to tolerate the feeds well and enteral nutrition completely in the first week of this study which was significantly correlated with a reduced hospitalization, fewer complications and better weight gain  ‎[12].

The gastrointestinal recovery during the postoperative phase is a key parameter which can be measured using the feeding tolerance  ‎[14]. In the present study the occurrence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the group with good feeding tolerance, as compared to the group with feeding intolerance ‎[13]. This is consistent with the previous findings that show early enteral nutrition improves gut motility, augmented mucosal integrity and reduced the chances of getting infections  ‎[15].

On the other hand, there was a correlation between feeding intolerance and delayed recovery and high hospitalization. The implication of these findings is that proper monitoring of care should be well observed, and the feeding intolerance should be under proper management during the postoperative period  ‎[16]. The correlation between early attainment of full enteral feeding and better outcomes is in line with the current practice of neonatal care which recommends early minimal enteral feeding. Infants whose initial full feeds occurred within less than seven days had far fewer complications, which supports the notion that early feeding assists in restoring gut functions quicker. In its turn, delayed feeding may reflect the underlying complications, or a lack of bowel motility, which in its turn may worsen recovery  ‎[17].

The other valuable discovery of this research is that between feeding tolerance and weight gain there exists a relationship. Babies who were well tolerated to feeds registered good weight gain against those who were intolerant to feeds. This highlights the nutritional value of early and effective enteral feeding as proper nutrition is vital to healing of the tissues and to the functioning of the immune system and overall development in the neonates  ‎[18]. An important indicator of recovery and utilization of health care resources is the length of hospital stay. In the experiment, the neonates with good feeding tolerance were discharged earlier and those with feeding intolerance had much longer hospital stay ‎[19]. Clinical and economic implications of such a finding are significant because the shorter period of the hospital stay does more than merely improving the patient outcomes and minimizes the burden of the healthcare systems .

Though these are important findings, there are some limitations that should be considered. The study was undertaken in a single centre which could be a limitation to the generalizability of the results. In addition, disparities in the surgical practice, postoperative care guidelines can add to feeding tolerance and recovery rates. The observational design does not allow establishing causality as well. Overall, this research paper shows the significance of feeding tolerance during the postoperative care of neonates undergoing GI surgery. The timely start and gradual advancement of enteral nutrition could significantly enhance the outcome of recovery, prevent complications, and enhance growth. The outcomes of this research could be used to develop universal feeding guidelines that would most effectively address the needs of neonatal care and improve clinical outcomes  ‎[20].

This research finds that feeding tolerance is a major factor that determines recovery among neonates who underwent gastrointestinal surgery. Timely initiation and successful accomplishment of enteral nutrition was largely correlated with improved clinical outcomes, including a decrease in the number of hospital stays, postoperative complications, and weight gain. Infants who attained complete enteral nutrition during the initial week had a quicker recovery and general health enhancement. Conversely, delayed recovery, greater morbidity, and longer hospitalization were associated with feeding intolerance. These results emphasise the need to monitor and ensure timely progression of enteral nutrition in the postoperative care of neonates. Standardized feeding and early nutritional intervention can enhance the gastrointestinal recovery and patient outcomes. It is indicated that there should be further multicentre studies that should be conducted to confirm such findings and to come up with evidence-based guidelines that can be used to improve the quality of neonatal surgery and long-term growth outcomes.

1.     Anderson, J. E., Galganski, L. A., Pivetti, C. D., Vanover, M. A., Stephenson, J. T., Brownlee, R., Ma, B., Farmer, D. L., & Hirose, S. (2019). Fetal repair of surgically-created gastroschisis in a lamb model may improve postnatal feeding tolerance and intestinal motility: A pilot study. Journal of pediatric surgery, 54(10), 2061-2068.

2.     Brindle, M. E., McDiarmid, C., Short, K., Miller, K., MacRobie, A., Lam, J. Y., Brockel, M., Raval, M. V., Howlett, A., & Lee, K.-S. (2020). Consensus guidelines for perioperative care in neonatal intestinal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. World journal of surgery, 44(8), 2482-2492.

3.     Cui, Y., Li, L., Hu, C., Shi, H., Li, J., Gupta, R. K., Liang, H., Chen, X., & Gong, S. (2018). Effects and tolerance of protein and energy‐enriched formula in infants following congenital heart surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 42(1), 196-204.

4.     Furlong-Dillard, J., Neary, A., Marietta, J., Jones, C., Jeffers, G., Gakenheimer, L., Puchalski, M., Eckauser, A., & Delgado-Corcoran, C. (2018). Evaluating the impact of a feeding protocol in neonates before and after biventricular cardiac surgery. Pediatric quality & safety, 3(3), e080.

5.     Greer, D., Karunaratne, Y. G., Karpelowsky, J., & Adams, S. (2020). Early enteral feeding after pediatric abdominal surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of pediatric surgery, 55(7), 1180-1187.

6.     Jadcherla, S. R., Khot, T., Moore, R., Malkar, M., Gulati, I. K., & Slaughter, J. L. (2017). Feeding methods at discharge predict long-term feeding and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants referred for gastrostomy evaluation. The Journal of pediatrics, 181, 125-130. e121.

7.     Mamatha, B., & Alladi, A. (2015). Early oral feeding in pediatric intestinal anastomosis. Indian Journal of Surgery, 77(Suppl 2), 670-672.

8.     McKean, E. B., Kasparian, N. A., Batra, S., Sholler, G. F., Winlaw, D. S., & Dalby-Payne, J. (2017). Feeding difficulties in neonates following cardiac surgery: determinants of prolonged feeding-tube use. Cardiology in the Young, 27(6), 1203-1211.

9.     Morton, D. L., Hawthorne, K. M., & Moore, C. E. (2017). Growth of infants with intestinal failure or feeding intolerance does not follow standard growth curves. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, 2017(1), 8052606.

10.   Nantasupha, C., Ruengkhachorn, I., & Ruangvutilert, P. (2016). Effect of conventional diet schedule, early feeding and early feeding plus domperidone on postcesarean diet tolerance: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 42(5), 519-525.

11.   Ou, J., Courtney, C. M., Steinberger, A. E., Tecos, M. E., & Warner, B. W. (2020). Nutrition in necrotizing enterocolitis and following intestinal resection. Nutrients, 12(2), 520.

12.   Penman, G., Tavener, K., & Hickey, A. (2017). Neonatal feeding: care and outcomes following gastrointestinal surgery. peptides, 80, 2.6.

13.   Prasad, G. R., Rao, J. S., Aziz, A., Rashmi, T., & Ahmed, S. (2018). Early enteral nutrition in neonates following abdominal surgery. J Neonatal Surg, 7(2), 21.

14.   Romano, C., Van Wynckel, M., Hulst, J., Broekaert, I., Bronsky, J., Dall'Oglio, L., Mis, N. F., Hojsak, I., Orel, R., & Papadopoulou, A. (2017). European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of gastrointestinal and nutritional complications in children with neurological impairment. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 65(2), 242-264.

15.   Shen, R. L., Thymann, T., Østergaard, M. V., Støy, A. C. F., Krych, Ł., Nielsen, D. S., Lauridsen, C., Hartmann, B., Holst, J. J., & Burrin, D. G. (2015). Early gradual feeding with bovine colostrum improves gut function and NEC resistance relative to infant formula in preterm pigs. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 309(5), G310-G323.

16.   Shores, D. R., Alaish, S. M., Aucott, S. W., Bullard, J. E., Haney, C., Tymann, H., Nonyane, B. A., & Schwarz, K. B. (2018). Postoperative enteral nutrition guidelines reduce the risk of intestinal failure–associated liver disease in surgical infants. The Journal of pediatrics, 195, 140-147. e141.

17.   Thompson, P. J., Walker, K., Halliday, R., Holland, A. J., & Trivedi, A. (2017). Early enteral feeding following repair of gastroschisis is associated with shorter length of admission and better nutritional outcomes. Journal of Clinical Neonatology, 6(4), 231-235.

18.   Tume, L. N., & Valla, F. V. (2018). A review of feeding intolerance in critically ill children. European journal of pediatrics, 177(11), 1675-1683.

19.   Wessel, J., Kotagal, M., & Helmrath, M. A. (2017). Management of pediatric intestinal failure. Advances in Pediatrics, 64(1), 253-267.

Wiernicka, A., Matuszczyk, M., Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz, A., Toporowska-Kowalska, E., Popińska, K., Chlebowczyk-Grzybowska, U., Hapyn, E., & Kierkuś, J. (2016). The protocol for a randomised-controlled trial of the evaluation of the tolerance and safety of early enteral nutrition in children after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement.(protocol version 09.01. 2015). BMC pediatrics, 16(1), 163.