Frequency of Different Stage Presentation of Retinoblastoma Visiting Ophthalmology Department at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors:
  • Dr Arwa Siddiqua , 1Resident ophthalmologist (PGR), BVH BWP
  • Prof Dr Soufia Farrukh , 2HOD Opthalmology, BVH BWP/ Principal QAMC
  • Dr Arooj Niaz , 3Resident Opthalmologist, BVH BWP
  • Dr. Iqra Khan , 4FCPS, Sheikh Zayad Medical College RYK
  • Dr. Khawar Bilal , 5House officer, BVH BWP

Article Information:

Published:December 30, 2025
Article Type:Original Research
Pages:8004 - 8009
Received:October 27, 2025
Accepted:December 19, 2025

Abstract:

Background: Despite being a significant health burden in underdeveloped nations, little is known about the clinical appearance and stages of retinoblastoma. This study's primary goal is to offer a thorough examination of different presentation stages in a context with limited resources. It has been suggested that treatment outcomes are better when applicable knowledge about the predominant stage of presentation is available because this can result in more successful primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare treatments. Materials and Methods: Total 90 patients of both sexes who are aged six months to ten years, having retinoblastoma are eligible to participate. Individuals suffering from bilateral retinoblastoma, eye trauma and prior retinoblastoma ocular surgery or enucleation were excluded. The parents of each patient were asked for their informed consent. Following pupillary dilatation with Tropicamide 2% eye drops, the patient had a B-scan and indirect bio-microscopy examination while under general anesthesia. The disease was staged. Results: The mean age in this study was 4.19 ± 1.78 years, with a range of 6 months to 10 years. Seventy-one (78.89%) of the patients were between the ages of six months and ten. With a male to female ratio of 1:4.6, 30 (33.33%) of the 90 patients were men and 60 (66.67%) were women. In our study, the average length of illness was 4.43 ± 1.64 months. In our study, 60.0% of the eyes with retinoblastoma had stage 2, 20.0% had stage 1 at initial presentation, 13.33% had stage 3, and 6.67% had stage 4. Conclusion: In order to promote earlier discovery and enhance the chances for globe salvage and vision preservation, these findings highlight the critical need for increased public awareness, routine pediatric eye screening, and prompt referral systems.

Keywords:

Retinoblastoma pediatric stage presentation advances.

Article :

Frequency of Different Stage Presentation of Retinoblastoma Visiting Ophthalmology Department at a Tertiary Care Hospital:

 

Original Research Article

Frequency of Different Stage Presentation of Retinoblastoma Visiting Ophthalmology Department at a Tertiary Care Hospital

  

Article History:

Abstract:

Background: Despite being a significant health burden in underdeveloped nations, little is known about the clinical appearance and stages of retinoblastoma. This study's primary goal is to offer a thorough examination of different presentation stages in a context with limited resources. It has been suggested that treatment outcomes are better when applicable knowledge about the predominant stage of presentation is available because this can result in more successful primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare treatments.

Materials and Methods: Total 90 patients of both sexes who are aged six months to ten years, having retinoblastoma are eligible to participate. Individuals suffering from bilateral retinoblastoma, eye trauma and prior retinoblastoma ocular surgery or enucleation were excluded. The parents of each patient were asked for their informed consent. Following pupillary dilatation with Tropicamide 2% eye drops, the patient had a B-scan and indirect bio-microscopy examination while under general anesthesia. The disease was staged.

Results: The mean age in this study was 4.19 ± 1.78 years, with a range of 6 months to 10 years. Seventy-one (78.89%) of the patients were between the ages of six months and ten. With a male to female ratio of 1:4.6, 30 (33.33%) of the 90 patients were men and 60 (66.67%) were women.  In our study, the average length of illness was 4.43 ± 1.64 months. In our study, 60.0% of the eyes with retinoblastoma had stage 2, 20.0% had stage 1 at initial presentation, 13.33% had stage 3, and 6.67% had stage 4.

Conclusion: In order to promote earlier discovery and enhance the chances for globe salvage and vision preservation, these findings highlight the critical need for increased public awareness, routine pediatric eye screening, and prompt referral systems.

 

Keywords: Retinoblastoma, pediatric, stage, presentation, advances.

 

Name of Author:

Dr Arwa Siddiqua1, Prof Dr Soufia Farrukh2, Dr Arooj Niaz3, Dr. Iqra Khan4, Dr. Khawar Bilal5

 

Affiliation: 1Resident ophthalmologist (PGR), BVH BWP

2HOD Opthalmology, BVH BWP/ Principal QAMC

3Resident Opthalmologist, BVH BWP

4FCPS, Sheikh Zayad Medical College RYK

5House officer, BVH BWP

 

Corresponding Author:

Dr Arwa Siddiqua

arwaalvi015@gmail.com

 

 

Received: 27-10-2025

Revised:    14-11-2025

Accepted:  19-12-2025

Published: 30-12-2025

 

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‑Noncommercial‑Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non‑commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

 

 

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Retinoblastoma accounts for about 4% of all pediatric cancers and is the most commonly reported intraocular malignant tumor in children.1 1 in 14,000 to 1 in 20,000 live births is its incidence rate.2 According to estimates, children under the age of five and those under ten have an annual crude incidence of Rb of 4.0/100,000 and 2.4/100,000, respectively.3 If the condition is not identified in its early stages, it could lead to blindness or possibly death. Recent technological developments have made it possible to diagnose Rb quickly and treat it effectively, boosting the survival rate to up to 95%. In order to reach this survival rate, developing nations continue to face numerous obstacles. Furthermore, there is no racial or gender preference for this cancer.4

Both unilateral and bilateral tumors can develop from retinablastoma. Leukocoria, strabismus, decreased vision, anterior chamber inflammatory signs, spontaneous hyphema, and proptosis are the most common presenting symptoms of retinoblastoma; however, in developing nations, proptosis and metastasis are reported to be the most common presenting symptoms.5,6 To define the clinical response to treatment and to stage intraocular illness, the International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification (IIRC) was created. Retinoblastoma is categorized in this method into groups A through E. Group A eyes have less disease and a higher chance of survival, while group E eyes have more disease and a worse prognosis when treated with chemotherapy alone.7 Of the 90.2% of eyes that emerged at IRSS stages II to IV in one study, 55% of the eyes had retinoblastoma at IRSS stage II.   At initial presentation, 15.6% of eyes showed overt orbital disease with metastatic retinoblastoma symptoms (IRSS stage IV), whereas 19.6% of eyes had regional extension of retinoblastoma at IRSS Stage III.8

Despite being a significant health burden in underdeveloped nations, little is known about the clinical appearance and stages of retinoblastoma. This study's primary goal is to offer a thorough examination of different presentation stages in a context with limited resources. It has been suggested that treatment outcomes are better when applicable knowledge about the predominant stage of presentation is available because this can result in more successful primary, secondary, and tertiary healthcare treatments.

 

METHODOLOGY:

During the course of 6 months, this Descriptive, Cross-sectional study was carried out at the Department of Ophthalmology, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur from 24 June 2025 to 23 September 2025. By using WHO calculator for single proportion, sample size of 90 cases has been calculated with 95% confidence level, 7.5% margin of error and taking percentage of stage IV as 15.6%.8 Patients of both sexes who are aged six months to ten years, having retinoblastoma (presence of proptosis (abnormal forward displacement of globe >20 mm examined by Hurlter’s exophthalmometer), Leukocoria (white pupillary reflex or cat's eye reflex on direct ophthalmoscopy) and presence of hyperattenuating intraocular areas consistent with calcifications (on CT scan)) are eligible to participate. Individuals suffering from bilateral retinoblastoma, eye trauma and prior retinoblastoma ocular surgery or enucleation were excluded.

The parents of each patient were asked for their informed consent. Following pupillary dilatation with Tropicamide 2% eye drops, the patient had a B-scan and indirect bio-microscopy examination while under general anesthesia. The disease was staged as under;

 

 

Figure: 1

 

 

 

 

The computer program SPSS 25.0 was used to evaluate the collected data. The data's normality was examined using the Shapiro-Wilk test.  Age and disease duration were used to compute the mean, standard deviation, or median (IQR).  For gender, side affected (left or right), and illness stage (1/2/3/4), frequency and percentage were computed. The post-stratification chi square/fisher exact test was used to control for effect modifiers such as age, gender, length of illness, and side effects. A P-value of less than 0.05 was regarded as significant.

 

RESULTS

The mean age in this study was 4.19 ± 1.78 years, with a range of 6 months to 10 years.  Seventy-one (78.89%) of the patients were between the ages of six months and ten. With a male to female ratio of 1:4.6, 30 (33.33%) of the 90 patients were men and 60 (66.67%) were women.  In our study, the average length of illness was 4.43 ± 1.64 months. Table I displays the distribution of patients with additional confounding variables.

According to Table II, 60.0% of the eyes with retinoblastoma in our study had stage 2, 20.0% had stage 1 at initial presentation, 13.33% had stage 3, and 6.67% had stage 4. Table III displays the stratification of retinoblastoma's various stage presentations according to age, gender, duration, and side affected.

 

 

Table I: Distribution of patients with other confounding variables (n=370)

Confounding variables

 

Frequency

%age

Age (years)

6 mon-5 years

71

78.89

6-10 years

19

21.11

Gender

Male

30

33.33

Female

60

66.67

Duration of disease (months)

≤6

79

87.78

>6

11

12.22

Side affected

Right

49

54.44

Left

41

45.56

 

Table-II: Frequency of different stage presentation of retinoblastoma (n=90).

Stage

No. of Patients

%age

1

18

20.0

2

54

60.0

3

12

13.33

4

06

6.67

 

 

Table III: Stratification of different stage presentation of retinoblastoma with respect to age, gender, duration and side affected.

Variable

Category

Stage 1

Stage 2

Stage 3

Stage 4

P-value

Age (years)

6 months–5 years

18 (25.35%)

41 (57.75%)

06 (8.45%)

06 (8.45%)

0.005

 

6–10 years

00 (0.0%)

13 (68.42%)

06 (31.58%)

00 (0.0%)

 

Gender

Male

10 (33.33%)

14 (46.67%)

04 (13.33%)

02 (6.67%)

0.149

 

Female

08 (13.33%)

40 (66.67%)

08 (13.33%)

04 (6.67%)

 

Duration of disease (months)

≤6

15 (18.99%)

47 (59.49%)

11 (13.92%)

06 (7.59%)

0.714

 

>6

03 (27.27%)

07 (63.64%)

01 (9.09%)

00 (0.0%)

 

Side affected

Right

11 (22.45%)

32 (65.31%)

03 (6.12%)

03 (6.12%)

0.167

 

Left

07 (17.07%)

22 (53.66%)

09 (21.95%)

03 (7.32%)

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

Using the International Intraocular Retinoblastoma Classification (IIRC) system, this study examined the clinical staging of retinoblastoma at the time of presentation, paying particular attention to age, gender, laterality, and symptom duration. Of the ninety patients, sixty percent had stage 2 retinoblastoma, twenty percent had stage 1 at initial presentation, thirteen percent had stage 3, and six and a half had stage 4. At presentation, the average age was 4.19 ± 1.78 years. The results of our study are consistent with literature showing that retinoblastoma typically affects children under the age of five9, with the majority being unilateral.10

Lack of public knowledge, incorrect diagnoses by non-specialists, conventional healing methods, and financial and geographic obstacles to receiving professional care are some of the factors that contribute to delayed presentation.11 Missed possibilities for early detection are a result of the limited integration of eye screening into regular pediatric or neonatal health examinations.12 Knowing the distribution of clinical stages at presentation serves as a baseline for evaluating the effects of upcoming awareness campaigns and screening initiatives, as well as an indicator of how well the current healthcare system detects ocular cancers.  Reducing the number of children who need high-dose chemotherapy or undergo enucleation can be achieved by moving toward earlier presentation trends.13 There is still a dearth of published information on the stage distribution of retinoblastoma at diagnosis in Pakistan, especially when considering national trends.

International studies have shown similar trends, with bilateral cases being discovered sooner as a result of family screening procedures.14,15 Bilateral eyes showed a significantly larger percentage of early stage (32.8%) than unilateral eyes (17.8%), despite the fact that both unilateral and bilateral cases mostly appeared in Groups D and E. This emphasizes how bilateral presentation might lead to an earlier clinical examination and the importance of genetic surveillance. These findings are in line with recent research that identified no differences in retinoblastoma stage at diagnosis based on gender, suggesting that sociocultural gender biases had no discernible effect on the time to diagnosis in this sample.16,17

Compared to older children, the percentage of early-stage diagnoses was somewhat greater for children under three. This is also in line with earlier studies that indicate older children frequently appear at more advanced stages due to delayed diagnosis and a failure to recognize symptoms.18,19 Advanced phases, however, continued to predominate even in younger age groups, suggesting structural obstacles to early detection. Children with Group D and E disease presented later, at 2.7 and 2.9 years, respectively, whereas children with Group B or C disease presented at a mean age of 2.3 to 2.4 years. The idea that diagnostic delays contribute to the course of the illness and that even brief time differences can cause intraocular retinoblastoma to significantly advance is further supported by this steady age-stage change. All things considered, these results are consistent with trends seen in a number of developing nations, where advanced-stage presentation and delayed diagnosis are caused by a lack of awareness, restricted access to specialized care, and a lack of frequent pediatric eye screening.20

Early identification of leucocoria in newborns, especially in children at risk, may improve clinical outcomes.  The significance of genetic counseling in the treatment of genetic retinoblastoma and early cancer detection cannot be denied.   The potential of social media to increase awareness of severe diseases like retinoblastoma can be used.  Retinoblastoma was discovered early because to awareness campaigns about the condition that were started by a number of centers in underdeveloped countries, including Pakistan.  It is essential to address these concerns at the national level.  Better medical education and training for healthcare professionals on the diagnosis of retinoblastoma is essential in this regard.21,22

This study's strength is its use of standardized clinical staging to provide useful local epidemiological data on the stage distribution of retinoblastoma upon presentation.  However, generalizability and thorough interpretation are constrained by its single center design, limited sample size, and absence of socioeconomic or outcome data.  To further understand the factors influencing stage at presentation and to inform strategies for early detection and better care of retinoblastoma, future multicenter research with bigger cohorts that incorporate socioeconomic determinants and long-term outcomes are advised.

 

CONCLUSION:

The majority of children with retinoblastoma arrive with the disease in an advanced stage. In order to promote earlier discovery and enhance the chances for globe salvage and vision preservation, these findings highlight the critical need for increased public awareness, routine pediatric eye screening, and prompt referral systems. They also reflect diagnostic delays.

 

REFERENCES:

 

1. Byroju VV, Nadukkandy AS, Cordani M, Kumar LD. Retinoblastoma: present scenario and future challenges. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21:226.

2. Ali MS, Sinha R, Bhaskar G, Kumari N, Sinha B. Demographic and clinical characteristics of retinoblastoma cases at a tertiary care center in Eastern India. Cureus. 2024;16(7):e64659.

3. Hazarika M, Kumar G, Saikia BJ, Sarangi SS, Roy PS, Bhattacharjee K, et al. Clinicoepidemiological profile and treatment outcomes in children with retinoblastoma: experience from a cancer care center in Northeast India. South Asian J Cancer. 2022;11:269-73.

4. Moothedath AW, Chopra KK, Seth R, Meena JP, Gupta AK, Kumar R, et al. Role of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography in predicting residual disease posttreatment completion in retinoblastoma patients. Indian J Nucl Med. 2022;37(2):142–6.

5. Sherief ST, Mulatu DG, Wu F, O’Banion J, Dimaras H. Clinicopathological presentation of retinoblastoma in Ethiopia. Ocular Oncol Pathol. 2022;8(3):168-74.

6. Limbu B, Kafle PA, Lamichanne DH, Pant SR, Shakya S, Rasaily SB. Epidemiological and clinical presentation of retinoblastoma among nepalese children in 2019. South Asian J Cancer. 2023;12(02):199-205.

7. Latif A, Qaddus HA, Tariq I, Hira B, Rasool FS, Ahmed S. Clinical profile and treatment outcomes of retinoblastoma experience from a low-income country. J Bacha Khan Med Coll. 2022;5(02):157-65.

8. Nkanga ED, Agbor IE, Okonkwo SN, Fabian ID, Esu EB, Nkanga DG, et al. Retinoblastoma in calabar Nigeria: An 18-month retrospective review of clinical presentation at a tertiary eye center. Niger J Med. 2022;31:149-55.

9. Mafwiri MM, Ngalula J, Mosenene NS, Mhina C, Sanyiwa A. Clinical picture and grouping of retinoblastoma at first presentation to a tertiary Hospital in Dar es Salaam: Implications for treatment outcomes. World J Adv Res Rev. 2021;11(03):168–77.

10. Khan F, Rehman AU, Nisha B, Zahid K. Clinical Staging of Retinoblastoma at Presentation: A Frequency Analysis. 2025;41(4):406-10.

11. Soliman SE, Dimaras H, Souka AA, Ashry MH, Gallie BL. Socioeconomic and psychological impact of treatment for unilateral intraocular retinoblastoma. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2015;38(6):550-558. Doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2015.03.003.

12. Malik AN, Evans JR, Gupta S, Mariotti S, Gordon I, Bowman R, et al.Universal newborn eye screening: a systematic review of the literature and review of international guidelines. J Glob Health. 2022;12:12003. Doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.12003.

13. Moeez Uddin M, Farooque U, Aziz MZ, Yasmin F, Qureshi F, Saeed Y, et al. Different Types of Clinical Presentations and Stages of Retinoblastoma Among Children. Cureus. 2020;12(9):e10672. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.10672.

14. Othman IS. Retinoblastoma major review with updates on Middle East management protocols. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2012;26(2):163-175. Doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2012.03.002.

15. Aerts I, Lumbroso-Le Rouic L, Gauthier-Villars M, Brisse H, Doz F, Desjardins L. Retinoblastoma. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006;1:31. Doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-1-31.

16. Wallach M, Balmer A, Munier F, Houghton S, Pampallona S, von der Weid N, et al. Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group; Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry. Shorter time to diagnosis and improved stage at presentation in Swiss patients with retinoblastoma treated from 1963 2006;118(5):e1493-1498. to 2004. Pediatrics. Doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0784.

17. Dimaras H, Corson TW, Cobrinik D, White A, Zhao J, Munier FL, et al. Retinoblastoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;1:15021. Doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.21.

18. Byroju VV, Nadukkandy AS, Cordani M, Kumar LD. Retinoblastoma: present scenario and future challenges. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21(1):226. Doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01223-z.

19. Butros LJ, Abramson DH, Dunkel IJ. Delayed diagnosis of retinoblastoma: analysis of degree, cause, and potential consequences. Pediatrics. 2002;109(3):E45. Doi: 10.1542/peds.109.3.e45.

20. Kaliki S, Ji X, Zou Y, Rashid R, Sultana S, Taju Sherief S, et al.Lag Time between Onset of First Symptom and Treatment of Retinoblastoma: An International Collaborative Study of 692 Patients from 10 Countries. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(8):1956. Doi: 10.3390/cancers13081956.

21. Mushtaq A, Gondal HZ, Qayyum S, Raza A, Azhar F. Causes of Delayed Presentation of Retinoblastoma in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Pakistan. Pak J Ophthalmol. 2022;38(2):125-9.

22. Malabanan-Cabebe CGP, Santos-Gonzales MA, Te ARV, Tan RDJ, Gonzales-Sy J. Retinoblastoma in the Southern Philippines: clinical outcomes of retinoblastoma patients in a Davao tertiary hospital. Acta Med Philipp. 2024;58:45-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47895/amp.vi0.6754.