Enhancing Medication Adherence and Quality of Life Through Nurse-Led Education in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients
- Saba Sabir , MSN Scholar, Lahore School of Nursing, The University of Lahore
- Madiha Mukhtar , Associate Professor, Lahore School of Nursing, The University of Lahore.
- Sarfraz Masih , Professor, Lahore School of Nursing, The University of Lahore.
Article Information:
Abstract:
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major global public health problem, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Poor medication adherence and a reduced quality of life are major challenges in TB management. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-led educational intervention on medication adherence and quality of life among pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Methodology: A quasi-experimental study with control and experimental groups was conducted at Christian Hospital Sahiwal over seven months. A total of 136 diagnosed pulmonary TB patients (68 per group) were selected using purposive sampling. The experimental group received structured nurse-led educational sessions based on the Health Belief Model, while the control group received routine care. Medication adherence was assessed using the Tuberculosis Medication Adherence Scale (TBMAS), and quality of life using the WHOQOL-BREF. Data were collected at baseline and one month post-intervention. Analysis was conducted using SPSS-25, applying the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Post-intervention, the experimental group showed a significant increase in medication adherence (from 51.67% to 65.00%, p < 0.001) and quality of life (from 29.61% to 58.55%, p < 0.001). The control group demonstrated minimal change in adherence (55.00% to 56.67%, p = 0.180) and a small increase in quality of life (33.55% to 37.50%, p = 0.011). All WHOQOL-BREF domains improved significantly in the experimental group. Conclusion: Nurse-led educational intervention significantly enhanced both medication adherence and quality of life among pulmonary TB patients. Incorporating such interventions into routine TB care could strengthen treatment outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Keywords:
Article :
INTRODUCTION:
Tuberculosis (TB), caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, remains a leading infectious cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide (1). Although primarily a pulmonary disease, TB may also affect the brain, lymph nodes, kidneys, and spine (2). The disease is especially prevalent in low- and middle-income countries where poverty, overcrowding, malnutrition, and limited healthcare access persist (3). Immunocompromised individuals—such as those with HIV, diabetes, or chronic malnutrition—are at increased risk (4). Globally, approximately 10 million people develop TB annually, with the highest burden in India, Pakistan, Indonesia, and China (5). Pakistan alone reports more than 570,000 new TB cases each year, placing it among the top five high-burden countries worldwide (6).
Despite the availability of effective anti-TB drugs, poor adherence, long treatment duration, drug toxicity, and limited patient knowledge significantly reduce treatment success (7). Inadequate adherence contributes to relapse, transmission, and the development of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) TB (8), with global treatment success rates estimated at only 54% (9). The DOTS strategy was introduced to combat these challenges (10), but its implementation faces barriers including workforce shortages (11), patient inconvenience, stigma (12), and frequent treatment interruptions (13). Consequently, there is a need for patient-centered and innovative strategies to improve adherence (14).
The WHO End TB Strategy emphasizes education, digital reminders, and supportive supervision as key approaches (15). Among these, nurse-led educational interventions are particularly promising (16). Nurses maintain continuous patient contact, enabling them to improve knowledge, address misconceptions, and strengthen motivation (17). Evidence suggests that educational interventions reduce stigma, enhance treatment adherence, and ultimately improve quality of life among TB patients (18).
Despite global recommendations, there is limited evidence from Pakistan regarding structured nurse-led educational programs targeting TB adherence and quality of life. This study aims to fill this gap by evaluating the impact of a nurse-led educational intervention on medication adherence and quality of life among pulmonary TB patients.
Methodology:
Study Design and Setting
A quasi-experimental study with control and experimental groups was conducted at Christian Hospital Sahiwal, Pakistan, over a period of seven months (March–September 2025).
Sample Size and Sampling Technique
A total of 136 diagnosed pulmonary TB patients were enrolled using purposive sampling. Participants were divided into control (n = 68) and experimental (n = 68) groups.
Inclusion Criteria
- Diagnosed pulmonary TB patients
- Aged 18 years and older
- On anti-TB medication for at least two weeks
- Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with MDR-TB or XDR-TB
- Critically ill patients unable to participate
- Patients with known psychiatric illness
Intervention
The experimental group received structured nurse-led educational sessions based on the Health Belief Model. The intervention included:
- Education on TB transmission, prevention, and treatment
- Importance of medication adherence
- Management of side effects
- Use of medication diaries
- Daily and weekly SMS reminders
- Counseling on lifestyle and nutrition
Sessions were delivered once weekly for four weeks (45–60 minutes each).
The control group received routine TB care only.
Data Collection Instruments
- Tuberculosis Medication Adherence Scale (TBMAS) – reliable and validated (α = 0.81) (19).
- WHOQOL-BREF Questionnaire – assessing physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains (α = 0.87) (20).
Data were collected at baseline and one month after completion of the intervention.
Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Since the data were non-parametric, the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was applied for pre- and post-intervention comparison within groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Lahore and hospital administration. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants, and confidentiality was maintained throughout.
RESULTS:
4.1 Demographic Characteristics
Table 4.1 presents the demographic characteristics of the participants (n = 136) in both experimental and control groups. The majority of participants in the experimental group were aged 18–35 years (52.9%), whereas in the control group most were above 65 years (36.8%). Females were slightly more represented in both groups, with 61.8% in the experimental group and 52.9% in the control group. In terms of marital status, most participants were single in both groups (58.8% experimental, 61.8% control). Regarding education, a considerable proportion of participants had completed high school in the experimental group (29.4%), while the control group had a higher percentage of participants with intermediate or above education (32.4%). Occupation-wise, daily wage workers made up the largest group in both experimental (42.6%) and control (52.9%) categories. More participants in the experimental group resided in urban areas (64.7%), while the control group had a majority from rural areas (61.8%). For monthly household income, most participants reported earnings between PKR 20,001–40,000 in both groups (35.3% experimental, 30.9% control).
Table 4.1 Demographics characteristics of participants (n=136)
|
Sr# |
Demographic Variables |
Category |
Group |
|
|
Experimental f (%) |
Control f (%) |
|||
|
1 |
Age in Years |
18-35 years |
36(52.9%) |
19(27.9%) |
|
36-50years |
15(22.1%) |
10(14.7%) |
||
|
51-65 years |
15(22.1%) |
14(20.6%) |
||
|
> 65 years |
2(2.9%) |
25(36.8%) |
||
|
2 |
Gender |
Male |
26(38.2%) |
32(47.1%) |
|
Female |
42(61.8%) |
36(52.9%) |
||
|
3 |
Marital Status |
Single |
40(58.8%) |
42(61.8%) |
|
Married |
28(41.2%) |
26(38.2%) |
||
|
|
|
Divorced |
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
|
4 |
Education Level |
Illiterate |
16(23.5%) |
12(17.6%) |
|
Primary school |
15(22.1%) |
20(29.4%) |
||
|
High school |
20(29.4%) |
14(20.6%) |
||
|
Intermediate & above |
17(25.0%) |
22(32.4%) |
||
|
5 |
Occupation |
Unemployed |
12(17.6%) |
7(10.3%) |
|
Daily wage worker |
29(42.6%) |
36(52.9%) |
||
|
Government/Private employee |
8(11.8%) |
4(5.9%) |
||
|
Skilled worker |
19(27.9%) |
21(30.9%) |
||
|
6 |
Area of Residence |
Urban |
44(64.7%) |
26(38.2%) |
|
Rural |
24 (35.3%) |
42(61.8%) |
||
|
7 |
Monthly Household Income (in PKR) |
< 20000 |
17(25.0%) |
19(27.9%) |
|
20001-40000 |
24(35.3%) |
21(30.9%) |
||
|
40,001 – 60,000 |
14(20.6%) |
18(26.5%) |
||
|
> 60,000 |
13(19.1%) |
10(14.7%) |
||
n=number of participants, f=frequency,%=percentage
Table 4.2 Group wise Comparison of Pre and Post Intervention Score of medicine adherence and quality of life
|
Score |
Control Group |
p-value |
Experimental Group |
p-value |
||
|
Pre |
Post |
Pre |
Post |
|||
|
Medicine Adherence (%) |
55.00 (50.83-60.00) |
56.67 (51.88-67.50) |
0.180 |
51.67 (45.83-62.92) |
65.00 (58.54-74.17) |
<0.001* |
|
Quality of life (%) |
33.55 (24.01-45.72) |
37.50 (29.28-49.67) |
0.011* |
29.61 (20.07-40.79) |
58.55 (42.44-68.42) |
<0.001* |
|
Overall Quality of Life and General Health |
3.5 (3-5) |
4 (3-5) |
0.063 |
3 (2-4) |
6 (4-8.75) |
<0.001* |
|
Physical Health |
13 (10.25-15) |
14 (11-17) |
0.524 |
12 (10-14) |
19 (14-23) |
<0.001* |
|
Psychological |
7 (5-8) |
7 (6-8) |
<0.001* |
7 (5-8) |
11 (9.25-12) |
<0.001* |
|
Social relationships |
8 (3.75-15) |
8.5 (6-12) |
<0.001* |
6 (3-9) |
10.5 (8-12) |
<0.001* |
|
Environment |
12.5 (10.25-17.75) |
16 (12.25-19) |
<0.001* |
12 (9.25-15) |
16 (14-21.75) |
<0.001* |
Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test
In control group, median medicine adherence score was 55.00 (50.83-60.00) at the time of baseline and after nurse led teaching was 56.67 (51.88-67.50). The pre and post score was not statistically significant (p-value 0.180). On the other hand, in experimental group medicine adherence score was increased after nurse led intervention 51.67 (45.83-62.92) to 65.00 (58.54-74.17). This difference was statistically significant (p-value <0.001)
DISCUSSION:
This study examined the effectiveness of nurse-led educational intervention on medication adherence and quality of life among pulmonary TB patients. Findings revealed that adherence was initially low across both groups, consistent with global patterns (27). After the intervention, the experimental group demonstrated a significant improvement, aligning with previous studies by Khamis et al. (2022) (16) and Onorikpori et al. (2022) (11), which reported that structured health education enhances adherence by addressing fear, stigma, and misconceptions.
Demographic differences such as age, gender, and socioeconomic status influenced baseline adherence levels. The greater representation of younger participants in the experimental group is in line with Hyvert et al. (2023) (21), who found that younger individuals face increased exposure and mobility-related risks. The predominance of daily wage workers indicates financial instability, which Chebet et al. (2022) (25) identified as a major barrier to adherence.
Quality of life improved significantly in the experimental group across physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains. This is consistent with studies by Chen et al. (2020) (28) and Sunarya & Pujasari (2024) (29), who reported low baseline QOL among TB patients due to stigma, isolation, and prolonged treatment. Nurse-led education contributed to improved coping mechanisms, self-confidence, and emotional support, leading to enhanced overall well-being. These findings agree with Dhiman et al. (2023) (30) and Waheed et al. (2021) (32).
Strengths
Use of validated tools
Structured and theory-based intervention
Statistically significant outcomes
Limitations
Non-probability sampling may limit generalizability
Short follow-up period (one month)
Single-center study
Self-reported adherence may be subject to bias
Conclusion:
The nurse-led educational intervention significantly improved medication adherence and quality of life among pulmonary tuberculosis patients. The intervention proved effective in enhancing knowledge, motivation, and treatment compliance. These findings support integrating nurse-led educational programs into routine TB care, especially in resource-constrained settings. Future studies should explore long-term effects and multi-center implementation.
References:
1. Sang RK, Kangethe S, Ayiro L, Changeiywo J. Medical Education Interventions on Non-Adherence toTuberculosis Treatment amongTb Patients in Kericho andNakuru Counties, Kenya.
2. Migliori GB, Dowdy D, Denholm JT, D'Ambrosio L, Centis R. The path to tuberculosis elimination: a renewed vision. European Respiratory Journal. 2023;61(6).
3. Organization WH. WHO guidelines on tuberculosis infection prevention and control: 2019 update: World Health Organization; 2019.
4. Chauhan A, Parmar M, Dash GC, Solanki H, Chauhan S, Sharma J, et al. The prevalence of tuberculosis infection in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2023;157(2&3):135-51.
5. Khusro A, Aarti CJWNoNS. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: An overview on infection beyond Lungs. 2020;28.
6. Seid G, Ayele MJAipm. Undernutrition and mortality among adult tuberculosis patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2020;2020.
7. Elbahloul M, Ali K, Alghennai S. Effectiveness of Health Education Intervention in Improving Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Regarding Tuberculosis Among Nurses Working in Tuberculosis Centers in Libya. 2023.
8. Akande PA. The effect of an educational intervention to improve tuberculosis infection control among nurses in Ibadan, south-west Nigeria: a quasi-experimental study. BMC nursing. 2020;19:1-9.
9. Abdullah M, Humayun A, Imran M, Bashir MA, Malik AAJJoF, Medicine C. A bibliometric analysis of global research performance on tuberculosis (2011–2020): Time for a global approach to support high-burden countries. 2022;29(2):117.
10. Mukuka B. A Study to Assess Anti-TB Treatment Compliance, Factors Predictive for Poor Adherence and Perpetual Defaulting among Patient Living with TB in Namuseche Chipata Eastern Province–Zambia. Mukuka Brian. 2024.
11. Onorikpori O, Ehiemere O, Maduakolam O, Ilo J. Impact of nurse-led health education on factors affecting non-compliance to anti-tuberculosis drug regimen among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in referral hospital, Nigeria. Nurse Care Open Acces J. 2022;8(2):54-9.
12. Mosiori KN, Titus AO, Amolo AS. Patients Characteristics Associated with Tuberculosis Treatment Default: A case control study in high incidence are in western Kenya. GSJ. 2022;10(3).
13. Kuganab-Lem R, Eliasu Y, Ameade E, Aryee P, Mohammed B, Boakye-Yiadom A, et al. Factors associated with default in TB treatment outcomes in the Bole District of Ghana: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical and Biomedical Sciences. 2023;9(1):35-51.
14. Cords O, Martinez L, Warren JL, O'Marr JM, Walter KS, Cohen T, et al. Incidence and prevalence of tuberculosis in incarcerated populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(5):e300-e8.
15. Oguya FO, Mbuti HK, Mwaniki E, Warutere P. Randomized control trial study on the effect of health education in promoting adherence to treatment among the urban and rural tuberculosis patients in Kenya. 2020.
16. Khamis KM, Kadir Shahar H, Abdul Manaf R, Hamdan HM. Effectiveness of education intervention of tuberculosis treatment adherence in Khartoum State: A study protocol for a randomized control trial. Plos one. 2022;17(11):e0277888.
17. Akwaowo C, Umoh I, Motilewa O, Umoh V, Usoroh E, Adeboye S, et al. Effect of training of frontline health workers on tuberculosis: a cluster randomized control trial in South Nigeria. F1000Research. 2022;10(837):837.
18. Salari N, Kanjoori AH, Hosseinian-Far A, Hasheminezhad R, Mansouri K, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infectious diseases of poverty. 2023;12(1):57.
19. Yin X, Tu X, Tong Y, Yang R, Wang Y, Cao S, et al. Development and validation of a tuberculosis medication adherence scale. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50328.
20. Vahedi S. World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF): analyses of their item response theory properties based on the graded responses model. Iranian journal of psychiatry. 2010;5(4):140.
21. Hyvert S, Yailian A-L, Haesebaert J, Vignot E, Chapurlat R, Dussart C, et al. Association between health literacy and medication adherence in chronic diseases: a recent systematic review. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy. 2023;45(1):38-51.
22. Sazali MF, Rahim SSSA, Mohammad AH, Kadir F, Payus AO, Avoi R, et al. Improving tuberculosis medication adherence: the potential of integrating digital technology and health belief model. Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases. 2023;86(2):82.
23. Nadon H, Dmello MK, Shetty S. Factors determining family and social support among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Public Health. 2023;45(3):e542-e50.
24. Batte C, Namusobya MS, Kirabo R, Mukisa J, Adakun S, Katamba A. Prevalence and factors associated with non-adherence to multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. African Health Sciences. 2021;21(1):238-47.
25. Chebet NA, Kirui J, Otieno G, Sanga D, Wanjau G, Yoos A. Tuberculosis treatment adherence among patients taking anti-TB drugs in Kilifi County, Kenya. African Journal of Health Sciences. 2022;35(2):210-23.
26. Abbas S, Kermode M, Khan MD, Denholm J, Adetunji H, Kane S. What makes people with chronic illnesses discontinue treatment? A practice theory informed analysis of adherence to treatment among patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in Pakistan. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2023;12.
27. Atif M, Ahmed W, Nouman Iqbal M, Ahmad N, Ahmad W, Malik I, et al. Frequency and factors associated with adverse events among multi-drug resistant tuberculosis patients in Pakistan: A retrospective study. Frontiers in Medicine. 2022;8:790718.
28. Chen X, Du L, Wu R, Xu J, Ji H, Zhang Y, et al. The effects of family, society and national policy support on treatment adherence among newly diagnosed tuberculosis patients: a cross-sectional study. BMC infectious diseases. 2020;20:1-11.
29. Sunarya U, Pujasari T. Quality of Life among Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients: Descriptive Study at Situ Community Health Center Sumedang Regency in 2023. PHSAJ-Public Health Sebelas April Journal. 2024;3(1):57-9.
30. Dhiman S, Bansal R, Kansal D, Sharma PK. Assessment of health related quality of life of drug resistant Tuberculosis patients. Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2023;5(2):62-5.
31. Rafiq M, Saqib SE, Atiq M. Health-related quality of life of tuberculosis patients and the role of socioeconomic factors: a mixed-method study. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 2022;106(1):80.
32. Waheed MA, Rehman I, Saeed B, Yousaf R, Aslam S. Health related quality of life among tuberculosis patients. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International. 2021;33(42A):282-8.